2nd Council, The First Council of Constantinople (A.D. 381)
SUMMARY:
SITE: Constantinople (near Bosporus, a strait in today's Turkey).
YEAR: A.D. 381
POPE: St. Damasus I, 367 - 384
EMPEROR: Theodosius I, the Great, 379 - 395
ReCondemned Arianism and Condemned Semi-Arianism(Christ is divine, but of a "lesser" divinity than the Father); Condemned Macedonians, who denied the divinity of the Holy Spirit; Defined the Holy Spirit as consubstantial with the Father and the Son; Completed the Nicene-Constantinople Creed (professed every Sunday at Holy Mass); Promulgated numerous dogmatic and disiplinary canons, (TFW:13,23,35,100)
First Council of Constantinople (381), under Pope Damasus and the Emperor Theodosius I, was attended by 150 Bishops. It was directed against the followers of Macedonius, who impugned the Divinity of the Holy Ghost. To the above-mentioned Nicene creed it added the clauses referring to the Holy Ghost (qui simul adoratur) and all that follows to the end.
ACTION: It appears that Pope St. Damasus I was not contacted in regard to this council attended by about 186 Bishops. Called by the emperor, it was not attended by the Pope or his legates or any Bishops from the West. Nevertheless, it is listed as a General Council of the 4th century by papal decrees of the 6th century, by which time its doctrinal definitions were accepted throughout the Church (Murphy, pg. 41). This council Condemned the heresy of Macedonius by clearly defining the divinity of the Holy Ghost: He is not created like the angels no matter how high an order is attributed to such a "creature." The council also Reaffirmed the faith of Nicaea.
NOTE: St. Gregory Nazianzen, Doctor of the Church (d. 389), was the bishop presiding. St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Doctor of the Church (d. 386), was also in attendance.
HERESIARCH: MACEDONIUS.
CREED
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth and of
all
things visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten
Son of God,
begotten of his Father before all worlds, Light of Light, very God of very God,
begotten
not made, being of one substance with the Father, by whom all things were made.
Who
for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate by the
Holy
Ghost and the Virgin Mary, and was made man, and was crucified also for us
under
Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried, and the third day he rose again
according to
the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth at the Right Hand of the
Father.
And he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead. Whose
kingdom shall have no end.
And [we believe] in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver-of-Live, who proceedeth
from
the Father, who with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified, who
spake by
the prophets. And [we believe] in one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. We
acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins, [and] we look for the
resurrection
of the dead and the life of the world to come. Amen.
LETTER OF THE HOLY SYNOD
TO EMPEROR THEODOSIUS THE GREAT
To the most religious Emperor Theodosius, the Holy Synod of Bishops assembled
in
Constantinople out of different Provinces.
We begin our letter to your Piety with thanks to God, who has established the
empire of
your Piety for the common peace of the Churches and for the support of the true
Faith.
And, after rendering due thanks unto God, as in duty bound we lay before your
Piety
the things which have been done in the Holy Synod. When, then, we had assembled
in
Constantinople, according to the letter of your Piety, we first of all renewed
our unity
of
heart each with the other, and then we pronounced some concise definitions,
ratifying
the Faith of the Nicene Fathers, and anathematizing the heresies which have
sprung up,
contrary thereto. Besides these things, we also framed certain Canons for the
better
ordering of the Churches, all which we have subjoined to this our letter.
Wherefore we
beseech your Piety that the decree of the Synod may be ratified, to the end
that, as you
have honoured the Church by your letter of citation, so you should set your
seal
to the
conclusion of what has been decreed. May the Lord establish your empire in
peace
and
righteousness, and prolong it from generation to generation; and may he add
unto
your
earthly power the fruition of the heavenly kingdom also. May God by the prayers
(euchais ton hagion) of the Saints, show favour to the world, that you may be
strong
and eminent in all good things as an Emperor most truly pious and beloved of
God.
THE CANONS
Of the 150 Fathers who Assembled at Constantinople during
the Consulate of Illustrious Men, Flavius Eucherius and
Flavius Evagrius on the VII of the Ides of July
The bishops out of different provinces assembled by the grace of God in
Constantinople, on the summons of the most religious Emperor Theodosius, have
decreed as follows:
Canon 1. The Faith of the Three Hundred and Eighteen Fathers assembled at Nice
in
Bithynia shall not be set aside, but shall remain firm. And every heresy shall
be
anathematized, particularly that of the Eunomians or [Anomoeans, the Arians or]
Eudoxians, and that of the Semi-Arians or Pneumatomachi, and that of the
Sabellians,
and that of the Marcellians, and that of the Photinians, and that of the
Apollinarians.
Canon 2. The bishops are not to go beyond their dioceses to churches lying
outside of
their bounds, nor bring confusion on the churches; but let the Bishop of
Alexandria,
according to the canons, alone administer the affairs of Egypt; and let the
bishops of
the
East manage the East alone, the privileges of the Church in Antioch, which are
mentioned in the canons of Nice, being preserved; and let the bishops of the
Asian
Diocese administer the Asian affairs only; and the Pontic bishops only Pontic
matters;
and the Thracian bishops only Thracian affairs. And let not bishops go beyond
their
dioceses for ordination or any other ecclesiastical ministrations, unless they
be
invited.
And the aforesaid canon concerning dioceses being observed, it is evident that
the
synod of every province will administer the affairs of that particular province
as was
decreed at Nice. But the Churches of God in heathen nations must be governed
according to the custom which has prevailed from the times of the Fathers.
Canon 3. The Bishop of Constantinople, however, shall have the prerogative of
honour
after the Bishop of Rome; because Constantinople is New Rome.
Canon 4. Concerning Maximus the Cynic and the disorder which has happened in
Constantinople on his account, it is decreed that Maximus never was and is not
now a
Bishop; that those who have been ordained by him are in no order whatever of
the
clergy; since all which has been done concerning him or by him, is declared to
be
invalid.
Canon 5. (Probably adopted at a Council held in Constantinople the next year,
382.) In regard to the tome of the Western [Bishops], we receive those in
Antioch also
who confess the unity of the Godhead of the Father, and of the Son, and of the
Holy
Ghost.
Canon 6. (Probably adopted at a Council held in Constantinople the next year,
382.) Forasmuch as many wishing to confuse and overturn ecclesiastical order,
do
contentiously and slanderously fabricate charges against the orthodox bishops
who have
the administration of the Churches, intending nothing else than to stain the
reputation
of
the priests and raise up disturbances amongst the peaceful laity; therefore it
seemed
right
to the Holy Synod of Bishops assembled together in Constantinople, not to admit
accusers without examination; and neither to allow all persons whatsoever to
bring
accusations against the rulers of the Church, nor, on the other hand, to
exclude
all. If
then, any one shall bring a private complaint against the Bishop, that is, one
relating
to
his own affairs, as, for example, that he has been defrauded, or otherwise
unjustly
treated by him, in such accusations no examination shall be made, either of the
person
or of the religion of the accuser; for it is by all means necessary that the
conscience
of
the Bishop should be free, and that he who says he has been wronged should meet
with
righteous judgment, of whatever religion he may be. But if the charge alleged
against the
Bishop be that of some ecclesiastical offence, then it is necessary to examine
carefully
the persons of the accusers, so that, in the first place, heretics may not be
suffered to
bring accusations touching ecclesiastical matters against orthodox bishops. And
by
heretics we mean both those who were aforetime cast out and those whom we
ourselves have since anathematized, and also those professing to hold the true
faith who
have separated from our canonical bishops, and set up conventicles in
opposition
[to
them]. Moreover, if there be any who have been condemned for faults and cast
out
of
the Church, or excommunicated, whether of the clergy or the laity, neither
shall
it be
lawful for these to bring an accusation against the bishop, until they have
cleared away
the charge against themselves. In like manner, persons who are under previous
accusations are not to be permitted to bring charges against a bishop or any
other
clergyman, until they shall have proved their own innocence of the accusation
brought
against them. But if any, being neither heretics, nor excommunicate, nor
condemned, nor
under previous accusation for alleged faults, should declare that they have any
ecclesiastical charge against the bishop, the Holy Synod bids them first lay
their
charges
before all the Bishops of the Province, and before them prove the accusations,
whatsoever they may be, which they have brought against the bishop. And if the
comprovincials should be unable rightly to settle the charges brought against
the bishop,
then the parties must betake themselves to a greater synod of the bishops of
that
diocese called together for this purpose; and they shall not produce their
allegations
before they have promised in writing to undergo an equal penalty to be exacted
from
themselves, if, in the course of the examination, they shall be proved to have
slandered
the accused bishop. And if anyone, despising what has been decreed concerning
these
things, shall presume to annoy the ears of the Emperor, or the courts of
temporal
judges, or, to the dishonour of all the Bishops of his Province, shall trouble
an
Ecumenical Synod, such an one shall by no means be admitted as an accuser;
forasmuch as he has east contempt upon the Canons, and brought reproach upon
the
order of the Church.
Canon 7. (Probably adopted at a later date.) Those who from heresy turn to
orthodoxy, and to the portion of those who are being saved, we receive
according
to
the following method and custom: Arians, and Macedonians, and Sabbatians, and
Novatians, who call themselves Cathari or Aristori, and Quarto-decimans or
Tetradites,
and Apollinarians, we receive, upon their giving a written renunciation [of
their errors]
and anathematize every heresy which is not in accordance with the Holy,
Catholic, and
Apostolic Church of God. Thereupon, they are first sealed or anointed with the
holy oil
upon the forehead, eyes, nostrils, mouth, and ears; and when we seal them, we
say,
"The Seal of the gift of the Holy Ghost." But Eunomians, who are baptized with
only one
immersion, and Montanists, who are here called Phrygians, and Sabellians, who
teach
the identity of Father and Son, and do sundry other mischievous things, and
[the
partisans of] all other heresies--for there are many such here, particularly
among those
who come from the country of the Galatians--all these, when they desire to turn
to
orthodoxy, we receive as heathen. On the first day we make them Christians; on
the
second, catechumens; on the third, we exorcise them by breathing thrice in
their
face
and ears; and thus we instruct them and oblige them to spend some time in the
Church,
and to hear the Scriptures; and then we baptize them.